{"id":8,"date":"2007-11-23T18:18:38","date_gmt":"2007-11-23T16:18:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediainterventions.net\/riglesias\/?p=8"},"modified":"2020-10-12T12:36:31","modified_gmt":"2020-10-12T11:36:31","slug":"elmundoes-2001","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ricardoiglesias.net\/en\/2007\/11\/elmundoes-2001\/","title":{"rendered":"elmundo.es"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"elmundo.es\"<\/a>
\n\"\"<\/a>elmundo.es<\/strong><\/em> (2001)<\/p>\n

Concept<\/em>
\nSi una noticia se define, entre otros conceptos, por su pertenencia al presente inmediato, \u00bfqu\u00e9 se puede considerar noticia dentro de la era de la postinformaci\u00f3n en el \u00e1mbito de Internet? \u00bfqu\u00e9 ocurre cuando una noticia deja de ser “noticia”? \u00bfpasa autom\u00e1ticamente a la esfera de la informaci\u00f3n y, por tanto, adquiere un estatus de durabilidad, que en otro caso le seria negado?<\/p>\n

If in the Internet time and space are \u201cliquid\u201d, that is, perpetually non-permanent, what happens then with the validity of that which is \u201cright now\u201d a piece of news, but not any more after just one second? What happens with national disasters, with social convulsions, with local and tribal wars, with ecological tragedies\u2026 all of which, at a given moment, completely hold public attention and help collect thousands of dollars out of our solidarity which will then be used for \u201cgood causes\u201d, but all of which are also immediately buried by fresh information? Is it not true that a piece of news should be something more than a mere item for immediate consumption, that it should set off deeper thoughts which might help find solutions for economical, social, ecological problems in the long run?<\/p>\n

Project
\nThis page is not really interactive. The moment an user connects to this web site, the page starts to disintegrate, but users can oly watch this\u2014they cannot intervene in this process.<\/p>\n